Open Access Medical Journals: Promise, Perils, and Pitfalls.
The number of both print and open access (OA) journals has increased dramatically. While electronic availability of information on the Internet may offer greater potential for information sharing, it also gives rise to "predatory" journals and deceptive publishers. In this Invited Commentary, the authors describe both the opportunities and potential perils that come with OA publications.Definitions for four models of legitimate OA are provided: the gold model, the green model, the platinum model, and the hybrid model. Benefits and risks of each model are discussed. The authors also distinguish between legitimate OA journals and predatory journals, highlighting several existing tools and resources for distinguishing between the two.Finally, the authors provide a checklist to help authors evaluate the policies and processes of journals and thereby avoid predatory publications.
Baker Eileen F; Iserson Kenneth V; Aswegan Andrew L; Larkin Gregory L; Derse Arthur R; Kraus Chadd K
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
2018
2018-12
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002563" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1097/ACM.0000000000002563</a>
Open Access Medical Journals: Promise, Perils, and Pitfalls
The number of both print and electronic open access (OA) journals has increased dramatically. Although electronic availability of information on the Internet may offer greater potential for information sharing, it also gives rise to "predatory" journals and deceptive publishers. In this Invited Commentary, the authors describe both the opportunities and potential perils that come with OA publications.Definitions for four models of legitimate OA are provided: the gold model, the green model, the platinum model, and the hybrid model. Benefits and risks of each model are discussed. The authors also distinguish between legitimate OA journals and predatory journals, highlighting several existing tools and resources for distinguishing between the two.Finally, the authors provide a checklist to help authors evaluate the policies and processes of journals and thereby avoid predatory publications.
Baker Eileen F; Iserson Kenneth V; Aswegan Andrew L; Larkin Gregory L; Derse Arthur R; Kraus Chadd K; of Emergency Physicians Ethics Committee American College
Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
2019
2019-05
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002563" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1097/ACM.0000000000002563</a>