1
40
1
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/2381468317715262" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1177/2381468317715262</a>
Pages
2381468317715262–2381468317715262
Issue
1
Volume
2
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Development, Validation, and Implementation of a Medical Judgment Metric.
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
MDM policy & practice
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2017
2017-06
Subject
The topic of the resource
clinical judgment; decision making; medical judgment; simulation
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Ahmed Rami A; McCarroll Michele L; Schwartz Alan; Gothard M David; Atkinson S Scott; Hughes Patrick G; Cepeda Brito Jose Ramon; Assad Lori; Myers Jerry G; George Richard L
Description
An account of the resource
Background: Medical decision making is a critical, yet understudied, aspect of medical education. Aims: To develop the Medical Judgment Metric (MJM), a numerical rubric to quantify good decisions in practice in simulated environments; and to obtain initial preliminary evidence of reliability and validity of the tool. Methods: The individual MJM items, domains, and sections of the MJM were built based on existing standardized frameworks. Content validity was determined by a convenient sample of eight experts. The MJM instrument was pilot tested in four medical simulations with a team of three medical raters assessing 40 participants with four levels of medical experience and skill. Results: Raters were highly consistent in their MJM scores in each scenario (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.965 to 0.987) as well as their evaluation of the expected patient outcome (Fleiss's Kappa 0.791 to 0.906). For each simulation scenario, average rater cut-scores significantly predicted expected loss of life or stabilization (Cohen's Kappa 0.851 to 0.880). Discussion: The MJM demonstrated preliminary evidence of reliability and validity.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/2381468317715262" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/2381468317715262</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2017
Ahmed Rami A
Assad Lori
Atkinson S Scott
Cepeda Brito Jose Ramon
clinical judgment
Decision Making
George Richard L
Gothard M David
Hughes Patrick G
McCarroll Michele L
MDM policy & practice
medical judgment
Myers Jerry G
Schwartz Alan
simulation