1
40
1
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr096" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr096</a>
Pages
iii19–32
Volume
66 Suppl 3
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
FOCUS 1: a randomized, double-blinded, multicentre, Phase III trial of the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone in community-acquired pneumonia.
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2011
2011-04
Subject
The topic of the resource
80 and over; 80 and Over; Aged; Bacteria; Bacteria/isolation & purification; Bacterial – Drug Therapy; Bacterial/*drug therapy; Ceftriaxone – Administration and Dosage; Ceftriaxone – Adverse Effects; Ceftriaxone/administration & dosage/adverse effects; Cephalosporins – Administration and Dosage; Cephalosporins – Adverse Effects; Cephalosporins/*administration & dosage/*adverse effects; Community-Acquired Infections – Drug Therapy; Community-Acquired Infections/*drug therapy; Double-Blind Method; Double-Blind Studies; Female; Human; Humans; Infusions; Intravenous; Male; Middle Age; Middle Aged; Pneumonia; Randomized Controlled Trials; Treatment Outcome; Treatment Outcomes
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
File Thomas M Jr; Low Donald E; Eckburg Paul B; Talbot George H; Friedland H David; Lee Jon; Llorens Lily; Critchley Ian A; Thye Dirk A
Description
An account of the resource
OBJECTIVES: Ceftaroline, the active form of the prodrug ceftaroline fosamil, is a novel cephalosporin with bactericidal activity against important pathogens associated with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), including Streptococcus pneumoniae and common Gram-negative pathogens. FOCUS 1 is a randomized, double-blinded, Phase III study that was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline fosamil in treating patients with CAP. The primary objective was to determine non-inferiority [lower limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) \textgreater/= -10%] in clinical cure rates achieved with ceftaroline fosamil compared with those achieved with ceftriaxone in the clinically evaluable (CE) and modified intent-to-treat efficacy (MITTE) populations. METHODS: Patients hospitalized in a non-intensive care unit setting with CAP of Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team (PORT) risk class III or IV requiring intravenous (iv) therapy were randomized (1:1) to receive 600 mg of ceftaroline fosamil iv every 12 h or 1 g of ceftriaxone iv every 24 h. Patients also received two 500 mg doses of oral clarithromycin every 12 h administered on day 1. Clinical cure, microbiological response, adverse events (AEs) and laboratory tests were assessed. FOCUS 1 registration number NCT00621504 (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00621504). RESULTS: Of 613 enrolled patients, 298 received ceftaroline fosamil and 308 received ceftriaxone. Baseline characteristics between treatment groups were comparable. Clinical cure rates were as follows: CE population, 86.6% (194/224) for ceftaroline fosamil and 78.2% (183/234) for ceftriaxone [difference (95% CI), 8.4% (1.4, 15.4)]; and MITTE population, 83.8% (244/291) for ceftaroline fosamil and 77.7% (233/300) for ceftriaxone [difference (95% CI), 6.2% (-0.2, 12.6)]. Clinical cure rates for CAP caused by S. pneumoniae in the microbiological MITTE population were 88.9% (24/27) and 66.7% (20/30) for ceftaroline fosamil and ceftriaxone, respectively. Both agents were well tolerated, with similar rates of AEs, serious AEs, deaths and discontinuations because of an AE. The most common AEs for ceftaroline fosamil-treated patients were diarrhoea, headache, insomnia and nausea, and the most common AEs for ceftriaxone-treated patients were hypokalaemia, hypertension, nausea and diarrhoea. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftaroline fosamil demonstrated high clinical cure and microbiological response rates in hospitalized patients with CAP of PORT risk class III or IV. Ceftaroline fosamil was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of ceftriaxone and consistent with the cephalosporin class. In this study, ceftaroline fosamil was an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for CAP.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr096" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1093/jac/dkr096</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2011
80 and over
Aged
Bacteria
Bacteria/isolation & purification
Bacterial – Drug Therapy
Bacterial/*drug therapy
Ceftriaxone – Administration and Dosage
Ceftriaxone – Adverse Effects
Ceftriaxone/administration & dosage/adverse effects
Cephalosporins – Administration and Dosage
Cephalosporins – Adverse Effects
Cephalosporins/*administration & dosage/*adverse effects
Community-Acquired Infections – Drug Therapy
Community-Acquired Infections/*drug therapy
Critchley Ian A
Department of Internal Medicine
Double-Blind Method
Double-Blind Studies
Eckburg Paul B
Female
File Thomas M Jr
Friedland H David
Human
Humans
Infusions
Intravenous
Lee Jon
Llorens Lily
Low Donald E
Male
Middle Age
Middle Aged
NEOMED College of Medicine
Pneumonia
RANDOMIZED controlled trials
Talbot George H
The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy
Thye Dirk A
Treatment Outcome
Treatment Outcomes