Effectiveness of a group exercise program in a long-term care facility: a randomized pilot trial.
Female; Male; Aged; Sensitivity and Specificity; Prospective Studies; Age Factors; Sex Factors; Analysis of Variance; Patient Compliance; Pliability; Frail Elderly; Nursing Homes; Confidence Intervals; Inpatients; Human; Descriptive Statistics; P-Value; Repeated Measures; Data Analysis Software; Pilot Studies; Clinical Trials; Summated Rating Scaling; Clinical Assessment Tools; Analysis of Covariance; Outcomes (Health Care); Range of Motion; Random Assignment; Treatment Outcomes; Gerontologic Care; Long Term Care; Functional Status; Geriatric Functional Assessment; Crossover Design; Housing for the Elderly; Muscle Strengthening; Recreation; 80 and Over; Group Exercise – In Old Age
Objective:The purpose of this pilot was to determine whether a strength and flexibility program in frail long-term care facility (LTC) residents would result in improved function.Design:A prospective, randomized, controlled, semicrossover trial was designed with participants assigned either to group exercise (EX) or recreational therapy (C). In the EX group, the intervention continued for 1 year. In the C group, recreation continued for 6 months; these controls were then crossed over to the same exercise intervention as the EX group and followed for an additional 6 months. Functional outcomes were measured at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months for both groups.Setting:A LTC facility, which included both assisted living (AL) and nursing home (NH) residents.Participants:Twenty frail residents (5 from NH, 15 from AL) aged 75 to 99 years at one LTC facility.Intervention:After random group assignment, the EX group met 1 hour three times per week. An exercise physiologist and LTC staff conducted sessions which included seated range of motion (ROM) exercises and strength training using simple equipment such as elastic resistance bands (therabands) and soft weights. The C group met three times per week and participated in activities such as painting during the first 6 months, before crossing over to exercise.Measurements and Methods:Objective measures of physical and cognitive function were obtained at baseline and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months using the timed get-up-and-go test (TUG), Berg balance scale, physical performance test (PPT), and mini-mental status exam (MMSE). Because we were interested in the impact of exercise on multiple endpoints and to protect the type I error rate, a global hypothesis test was used.Results:There was a significant overall impact across the four measures of the exercise intervention (P = 0.013). Exercise benefit as indicated by the difference between exercise and control conditions showed exercise decreased TUG by 18 seconds, which represents an effect size (in standard deviation units) of 0.50, increased PPT scores by 1.3, with effect size = 0.40, increased Berg scores by 4.8, with effect size of 0.32, and increased MMSE by 3.1, with effect size = 0.54. Except for the Berg, 90% confidence intervals on these exercise effects excluded 0.Conclusion:Frail elderly in a LTC facility were able to participate and benefit from a strength training program. The program was delivered with low-cost equipment by an exercise physiologist and LTC staff. The advantage of such a program is that it provides recreational and therapeutic benefits.
Baum EE; Jarjoura D; Polen AE; Faur D; Rutechi G
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
2003
2003-04-03
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/s1525-8610(04)70279-0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/s1525-8610(04)70279-0</a>
A systematic – and realistic – approach to functional assessment of elderly persons.
Male; Aged; Functional Status; Dementia – Diagnosis – In Old Age; Depression – Diagnosis – In Old Age; Geriatric Assessment – Utilization
Murphy DP; Cleveland M
Consultant (00107069)
2004
2004-01
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Trauma history as a resilience factor for patients recovering from total knee replacement surgery.
Female; Male; Ohio; Aged; Risk Factors; Pain Measurement; Arthroplasty; Psychological Tests; Human; Descriptive Statistics; Funding Source; Scales; Middle Age; Coefficient Alpha; Effect Size; Clinical Assessment Tools; Impact of Events Scale; T-Tests; Trauma; Stress; Recovery; Replacement; Psychological; Post-Traumatic; Stress Disorders; STATISTICS; RESEARCH funding; POST-traumatic stress disorder; DESCRIPTIVE statistics; TREATMENT effectiveness; CONVALESCENCE; CORRELATION (Statistics); EFFECT sizes (Statistics); LIFE change events; LIFE skills; OHIO; PAIN measurement; PSYCHOLOGICAL tests; REHABILITATION; RESILIENCE (Personality trait); STRESS (Psychology); T-test (Statistics); TOTAL knee replacement; WOUNDS & injuries; Treatment Outcomes; Bivariate Statistics; Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; Functional Status; Hardiness; 80 and Over; Knee – Psychosocial Factors; Knee – Rehabilitation; TOTAL knee replacement – Psychological aspects
Research concerning the impact of trauma history on individuals' ability to cope with subsequent events is mixed. While many studies find that trauma history increases vulnerability for conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder and chronic pain, others reveal that there are benefits associated with moderate levels of stress (e.g. development of coping skills). Objective: The present study investigated whether the experience of prior traumatic stressors would serve as a risk or resilience factor based on physical and emotional outcomes among patients recovering from total knee replacement surgery (TKR). Design: 110 patients undergoing unilateral, TKR completed surveys before surgery, as well as one and three months following the procedure. Results: Contrary to hypotheses, patients who reported more prior traumas experienced less severe pain and functional limitations at one- (β = −.259,p = .006) and three-month follow-up assessments (β = −.187,p = .04). A similar pattern emerged when specific types of traumas (e.g. interpersonal) were examined in relation to physical recovery. Further, patients’ trauma history was negatively related to symptoms of post-traumatic stress three-months following surgery (e.g. Avoidance:β = −.200,p = .037). Conclusion: Trauma history represents a source of resilience, rather than vulnerability, within the context of arthroplastic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]
Cremeans-Smith Julie K; Greene Kenneth; Delahanty Douglas L
Psychology & Health
2015
2015-09
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2014.1001391" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1080/08870446.2014.1001391</a>