1
40
3
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14248" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14248</a>
Pages
2087–2092
Issue
10
Volume
36
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Agreement Between an Automated Volume Breast Scanner and Handheld Ultrasound for Diagnostic Breast Examinations.
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2017
2017-10
Subject
The topic of the resource
automated breast ultrasound; Automated/*methods; breast; Breast Neoplasms/*diagnostic imaging; breast ultrasound; Breast/diagnostic imaging; diagnostic workup; Female; Humans; Mammary/*instrumentation/*methods; Middle Aged; Observer Variation; Pattern Recognition; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography; ultrasound; volumetric breast ultrasound
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Barr Richard G; DeVita Robert; Destounis Stamatia; Manzoni Federica; De Silvestri Annalisa; Tinelli Carmine
Description
An account of the resource
OBJECTIVES: To compare the agreement and interobserver variability of diagnostic handheld ultrasound (US) and a single volume on an automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) and to determine whether there was a significant difference if the ABVS was used by a sonographer or mammographic technologist. METHODS: Ninety patients scheduled for diagnostic US examinations were randomized to either handheld US or the ABVS first. The AVBS was randomized between a sonographer and a mammographic technologist performing the study. The studies were blinded, randomized, and read by 2 radiologists. The lesion with the highest Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) score was used in the analysis. Final diagnoses were made by core biopsy or follow-up for 2 years. Lesions included 9 malignant and 81 benign. RESULTS: The 90 patients had a mean age +/- SD of 53.1 +/- 16.3 years. The kappa value for agreement between the ABVS and handheld US was 0.831 (95% confidence interval, 0.744-0.925), whereas the global agreement for a 7-point BI-RADS score was 0.488 (0.372-0.560). The agreement between the ABVS and handheld US was nearly the same when the ABVS was used by a mammographic technologist (kappa = 0.858 [0.723-0.963]) or sonographer (kappa = 0.803 [0.596-1.000]; P = .47). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for characterization by the ABVS were 0.91 (0.84-0.96) for reader 1 and 0.91 (0.83-0.96) for reader 2; those for handheld US were 0.91 (0.84-0.96) for reader 1 and 0.83 (0.74-0.90) for reader 2, with no statistical difference. The agreement based on pathologic images was kappa = 0.831 (0.718-0.944); for handheld US, kappa = 0.795 (0.623-0.967); and for the AVBS, kappa = 0.869 (0.725-1.000). CONCLUSIONS: Performing a single-view diagnostic ABVS examination has good agreement with a handheld diagnostic US workup. There is no difference if the ABVS is used by a sonographer or mammographic technologist.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14248" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1002/jum.14248</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2017
automated breast ultrasound
Automated/*methods
Barr Richard G
breast
Breast Neoplasms/*diagnostic imaging
breast ultrasound
Breast/diagnostic imaging
De Silvestri Annalisa
Destounis Stamatia
DeVita Robert
diagnostic workup
Female
Humans
Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
Mammary/*instrumentation/*methods
Manzoni Federica
Middle Aged
Observer Variation
Pattern Recognition
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tinelli Carmine
Ultrasonography
Ultrasound
volumetric breast ultrasound
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14849" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14849</a>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Diagnostic Performance and Accuracy of the 3 Interpreting Methods of Breast Strain Elastography: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2018
2018-11
Subject
The topic of the resource
breast; breast cancer; breast tumors; elastography; sonoelastography
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Barr Richard G; De Silvestri Annalisa; Scotti Valeria; Manzoni Federica; Rebuffi Chiara; Capittini Cristina; Tinelli Carmine
Description
An account of the resource
There are 3 methods of interpreting breast strain elastography: the elastographic-to-B-mode length ratio (E/B), a 5-point color scale (5P), and the strain ratio (SR). This meta-analysis assessed which method is superior to the others. A systematic search of the medical literature was performed in July 2017. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) had biopsy-proven or long-term stability as the reference standard; (2) used either the E/B, 5P, or SR to interpret results; and (3) had at least 50 cases. A total of 220 records were retrieved; 60 full-text articles were examined, and 46 were included in the meta-analysis. Publication years ranged from 2007 and 2017. The quality of studies was generally high. The mean age of women was 48 years; 12,398 lesions (4242 malignant) were analyzed. For the 5P method, the sensitivity was 77%; specificity, 87%; positive likelihood ratio (LR), 5.3; and negative LR, 0.24. For the SR method, sensitivity was 87%; specificity, 81%; positive LR, 4.8; and negative LR, 0.16. For the E/B method, sensitivity was 96%; specificity, 88%; positive LR, 7.1; and negative LR, 0.03. Of the 3 methods, the E/B had the highest sensitivity, and the E/B and 5P had the highest specificity. With a negative LR of 0.03, the E/B method can downgrade lesions with a pretest probability of 50% to a 2% probability of malignancy.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14849" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1002/jum.14849</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2018
Barr Richard G
breast
breast cancer
breast tumors
Capittini Cristina
De Silvestri Annalisa
elastography
Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
Manzoni Federica
Rebuffi Chiara
Scotti Valeria
sonoelastography
Tinelli Carmine
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14849" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14849</a>
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Pages
1397-1404
Issue
6
Volume
38
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Diagnostic Performance and Accuracy of the 3 Interpreting Methods of Breast Strain Elastography: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine: Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2019
2019-06
Subject
The topic of the resource
breast; breast cancer; breast tumors; elastography; sonoelastography
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Barr Richard G; De Silvestri Annalisa; Scotti Valeria; Manzoni Federica; Rebuffi Chiara; Capittini Cristina; Tinelli Carmine
Description
An account of the resource
There are 3 methods of interpreting breast strain elastography: the elastographic-to-B-mode length ratio (E/B), a 5-point color scale (5P), and the strain ratio (SR). This meta-analysis assessed which method is superior to the others. A systematic search of the medical literature was performed in July 2017. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they fulfilled the following criteria: (1) had biopsy-proven or long-term stability as the reference standard; (2) used either the E/B, 5P, or SR to interpret results; and (3) had at least 50 cases. A total of 220 records were retrieved; 60 full-text articles were examined, and 46 were included in the meta-analysis. Publication years ranged from 2007 and 2017. The quality of studies was generally high. The mean age of women was 48 years; 12,398 lesions (4242 malignant) were analyzed. For the 5P method, the sensitivity was 77%; specificity, 87%; positive likelihood ratio (LR), 5.3; and negative LR, 0.24. For the SR method, sensitivity was 87%; specificity, 81%; positive LR, 4.8; and negative LR, 0.16. For the E/B method, sensitivity was 96%; specificity, 88%; positive LR, 7.1; and negative LR, 0.03. Of the 3 methods, the E/B had the highest sensitivity, and the E/B and 5P had the highest specificity. With a negative LR of 0.03, the E/B method can downgrade lesions with a pretest probability of 50% to a 2% probability of malignancy.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14849" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1002/jum.14849</a>
2019
Barr Richard G
breast
breast cancer
breast tumors
Capittini Cristina
De Silvestri Annalisa
Department of Radiology
elastography
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine: Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
June 2019 Update
Manzoni Federica
NEOMED College of Medicine
Rebuffi Chiara
Scotti Valeria
sonoelastography
Tinelli Carmine