1
40
1
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.029" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.029</a>
Pages
20–27
Issue
1
Volume
9
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Identifying motivators and barriers to student completion of instructor evaluations: A multi-faceted, collaborative approach from four colleges of pharmacy.
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2017
2017-02
Subject
The topic of the resource
*Attitude of Health Personnel; *Barriers; *Faculty; *Focus group; *Instructor evaluation; *Motivators; *Student; Adult; Education; Educational Measurement/methods/*standards; Faculty/standards; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Motivation; Ohio; Pharmacy/*methods; Pharmacy/*psychology; Students; Surveys and Questionnaires; Universities/organization & administration
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
McAuley James W; Backo Jennifer Lynn; Sobota Kristen Finley; Metzger Anne H; Ulbrich Timothy
Description
An account of the resource
OBJECTIVE: To identify motivators and barriers to pharmacy student completion of instructor evaluations, and to develop potential strategies to improve the evaluation process. METHODS: Completed at four Ohio Colleges of Pharmacy, Phase I consisted of a student/faculty survey and Phase II consisted of joint student/faculty focus groups to discuss Phase I data and to problem solve. RESULTS: In Phase I, the top three student-identified and faculty-perceived motivators to completion of evaluations were to (1) make the course better, (2) earn bonus points, and (3) improve the instructor's teaching. The top three student-identified barriers to completion of evaluations were having to (1) evaluate multiple instructors, (2) complete several evaluations around the same time, and (3) complete lengthy evaluations. Phase II focus groups identified a number of potential ways to enhance the motivators and reduce barriers, including but not limited to making sure faculty convey to students that the feedback they provide is useful and to provide examples of how student feedback has been used to improve their teaching/the course. CONCLUSIONS: Students and faculty identified motivators and barriers to completing instructor evaluations and were willing to work together to improve the process.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.029" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.029</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
*Attitude of Health Personnel
*Barriers
*Faculty
*Focus group
*Instructor evaluation
*Motivators
*Student
2017
Adult
Backo Jennifer Lynn
Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Department of Pharmacy Practice
Education
Educational Measurement/methods/*standards
Faculty/standards
Female
Humans
Male
McAuley James W
Metzger Anne H
Middle Aged
Motivation
NEOMED College of Pharmacy
Ohio
Pharmacy/*methods
Pharmacy/*psychology
Sobota Kristen Finley
Students
Surveys and Questionnaires
Ulbrich Timothy
Universities/organization & administration