1
40
4
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/</a>
Pages
1-6
ISSN
8820538
Search for Full-text
Locate full-text within NEOMED Library's e-journal collections
<a href="http://neomed.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://doi.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NEOMED Full-text Holding (if available) - Proxy DOI: </a>
<p>Users with a NEOMED Library login can search for full-text journal articles at the following url: <a href="https://libraryguides.neomed.edu/home">https://libraryguides.neomed.edu/home</a></p>
Update Year & Number
April 2021 List
NEOMED College
NEOMED College of Medicine Student
NEOMED Department
NEOMED Student Publication
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Ophthalmology residency match in the COVID-19 era: Applicant and program director perceptions of the 2020-2021 application cycle.
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Seminars In Ophthalmology
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2021
2021-04-09
Subject
The topic of the resource
medical student; Residency; COVID-19; Application; Match
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Venincasa MJ; Steren B; Young BK; Parikh A; Ahmed B; Sridhar J; Kombo N
Description
An account of the resource
<bold>Objective:</bold> To evaluate the experiences and preferences of ophthalmology residency applicants and program directors (PDs), with emphasis on the effect of COVID-19 as well as recent changes on the application process. <bold>Design:</bold> Cross-sectional, online surveyParticipants: All applicants to the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute ophthalmology residency program, and all United States ophthalmology residency PDs, during the 2020–2021 application cycle. <bold>Methods:</bold> An online survey was distributed to applicants and program directors of the 2020–2021 ophthalmology residency application cycle.Main Outcome Measures: Applicant demographics, application submissions, interview experiences, financial considerations, match results, and suggestions for improvement of the application process. <bold>Results:</bold> Responses were obtained from 205 applicants (34.9% response rate) and 37 PDs (30.3%). A successful match into an ophthalmology residency was achieved by 144 (83.7%) applicants. Applicants applied to (mean ± SD) 79.7 ± 22.8 ophthalmology residency programs, received 13.1 ± 8.9 invitations to interview, and attended 11.1 ± 5.8 interviews. Most applicants (N = 126; 71.2%) and PDs (N = 22; 78.6%) expressed a preference for in-person interviews over virtual interviews. If given a choice regarding the future direction for interviews, most applicants were unsure (N = 68; 38.4%) or would prefer to hold interviews virtually (N = 62; 35.0%); PDs felt that interviews should go back to being in-person (39.3%) or were unsure (28.6%). Most PDs (N = 21; 72.4%) reported an increased number of applications received by their respective programs this year compared to previous years. While applicants (N = 108; 61.0%) mostly felt that there should not be a cap on the number of applications, 19 (67.9%) PDs supported a limit on application numbers. Applicants spent an average (SD) of $2320.96 ($1172.86) on the application process this year, which is significantly less than 2018–2019 data. <bold>Conclusions:</bold> The ophthalmology residency application process was especially complex during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although many applicants and PDs were glad that interviews were held virtually this year, they were less certain regarding future years. The virtual format led to a significantly lower financial burden for applicants and may lead some to prefer this format in the future; if a hybrid model is offered for virtual/in-person interviews, these two interview modes should be compared equally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"></a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
journalArticle
2021
Ahmed B
Application
April 2021 List
COVID-19
journalArticle
Kombo N
Match
medical student
NEOMED College of Medicine Student
NEOMED Student Publications
Parikh A
residency
Seminars In Ophthalmology
Sridhar J
Steren B
Venincasa MJ
Young BK
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1906917" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1906917</a>
Pages
1-6
ISSN
1744-5205 0882-0538
Search for Full-text
Locate full-text within NEOMED Library's e-journal collections
<a href="http://neomed.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1906917" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NEOMED Full-text Holding (if available) - Proxy DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1906917</a>
<p>Users with a NEOMED Library login can search for full-text journal articles at the following url: <a href="https://libraryguides.neomed.edu/home">https://libraryguides.neomed.edu/home</a></p>
Update Year & Number
April 2021 List
NEOMED College
NEOMED College of Medicine Student
NEOMED Department
NEOMED Student Publications
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Ophthalmology residency match in the COVID-19 era: Applicant and program director perceptions of the 2020-2021 application cycle.
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Seminars In Ophthalmology
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2021
2021-04-07
Subject
The topic of the resource
Application; COVID-19; Match; medical student; Residency
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Venincasa MJ; Steren B; Young BK; Parikh A; Ahmed B; Sridhar J; Kombo N
Description
An account of the resource
Objective: To evaluate the experiences and preferences of ophthalmology residency applicants and program directors (PDs), with emphasis on the effect of COVID-19 as well as recent changes on the application process.Design: Cross-sectional, online surveyParticipants: All applicants to the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute ophthalmology residency program, and all United States ophthalmology residency PDs, during the 2020-2021 application cycle.Methods: An online survey was distributed to applicants and program directors of the 2020-2021 ophthalmology residency application cycle.Main Outcome Measures: Applicant demographics, application submissions, interview experiences, financial considerations, match results, and suggestions for improvement of the application process.Results: Responses were obtained from 205 applicants (34.9% response rate) and 37 PDs (30.3%). A successful match into an ophthalmology residency was achieved by 144 (83.7%) applicants. Applicants applied to (mean ± SD) 79.7 ± 22.8 ophthalmology residency programs, received 13.1 ± 8.9 invitations to interview, and attended 11.1 ± 5.8 interviews. Most applicants (N = 126; 71.2%) and PDs (N = 22; 78.6%) expressed a preference for in-person interviews over virtual interviews. If given a choice regarding the future direction for interviews, most applicants were unsure (N = 68; 38.4%) or would prefer to hold interviews virtually (N = 62; 35.0%); PDs felt that interviews should go back to being in-person (39.3%) or were unsure (28.6%). Most PDs (N = 21; 72.4%) reported an increased number of applications received by their respective programs this year compared to previous years. While applicants (N = 108; 61.0%) mostly felt that there should not be a cap on the number of applications, 19 (67.9%) PDs supported a limit on application numbers. Applicants spent an average (SD) of $2320.96 ($1172.86) on the application process this year, which is significantly less than 2018-2019 data.Conclusions: The ophthalmology residency application process was especially complex during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although many applicants and PDs were glad that interviews were held virtually this year, they were less certain regarding future years. The virtual format led to a significantly lower financial burden for applicants and may lead some to prefer this format in the future; if a hybrid model is offered for virtual/in-person interviews, these two interview modes should be compared equally.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2021.1906917" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1080/08820538.2021.1906917</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
journalArticle
2021
Ahmed B
Application
April 2021 List
COVID-19
journalArticle
Kombo N
Match
medical student
NEOMED College of Medicine Student
NEOMED Student Publications
Parikh A
residency
Seminars In Ophthalmology
Sridhar J
Steren B
Venincasa MJ
Young BK
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003107" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003107</a>
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
ISSN
1539-2864 0275-004X
Search for Full-text
Locate full-text within NEOMED Library's e-journal collections
<a href="http://neomed.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003107" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">NEOMED Full-text Holding (if available) - Proxy DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003107</a>
<p>Users with a NEOMED Library login can search for full-text journal articles at the following url: <a href="https://libraryguides.neomed.edu/home">https://libraryguides.neomed.edu/home</a></p>
Update Year & Number
February 2021 List
NEOMED College
NEOMED College of Medicine Student
NEOMED Department
NEOMED Student Publications
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Positive Results Bias and Impact Factor in Retina Clinical Trials 2016-2019.
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2021
2021-01-07
Subject
The topic of the resource
vitreoretinal disease
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Parikh A;Markle J;Venincasa M;Kuriyan AE;Gupta M;Sridhar J
Description
An account of the resource
PURPOSE: To assess for a positive results bias in recently published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the field of vitreoretinal disease.Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted examining RCTs published in the field of retina between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. Studies were classified as positive result or negative result based on the statistical significance of their primary outcome. Publication date and sample size were documented. These variables were compared against Journal Citation Reports Impact Factor in the year of publication.Results: 288 RCTs from 64 unique journals were included and analyzed. 185 (64.2%) studies were classified as positive result, and 103 (35.8%) studies were classified as negative result. There was no association between impact factor and positive result. Studies classified as positive result had larger sample sizes, and higher sample size was associated with higher impact factor. CONCLUSION: These results do not support the presence of a recent positive results bias in retina RCTs. This is reassuring, although several factors could be contributing to this finding including studies that were conducted but never submitted and selective reporting of outcomes. Thus, it will be important to remain cognizant of potential publication biases moving forward.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003107" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1097/IAE.0000000000003107</a>
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
journalArticle
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Retina
2021
February 2021 List
Gupta M
journalArticle
Kuriyan AE
Markle J
NEOMED College of Medicine Student
NEOMED Student Publications
Parikh A
retina
Sridhar J
Venincasa M
vitreoretinal disease
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.04.100286" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.04.100286</a>
Rights
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
Pages
429-435
Issue
4
Volume
24
Search for Full-text
Locate full-text within NEOMED Library's e-journal collections
<p>Users with a NEOMED Library login can search for full-text journal articles at the following url: <a href="https://libraryguides.neomed.edu/home">https://libraryguides.neomed.edu/home</a></p>
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Incidence Of Staphylococcus Aureus Nasal Colonization And Soft Tissue Infection Among High School Football Players
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2011
2011-07
Subject
The topic of the resource
Athlete; carriage; community; epidemiology; General & Internal Medicine; healthy-children; MRSA; outbreak; population; prevalence; risk-factors; skin; Skin Infection; team
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Lear A; McCord G; Peiffer J; Watkins R R; Parikh A; Warrington S
Description
An account of the resource
Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin and soft tissue infections have been documented with increasing frequency in both team and individual sports in recent years. It also seems that the level of MRSA skin and soft tissue infections in the general population has increased. Methods: One hundred ninety athletes from 6 local high school football teams were recruited for this prospective observational study to document nasal colonization and the potential role this plays in skin and soft tissue infections in football players and, in particular, MRSA infections. Athletes had nasal swabs done before their season started, and they filled out questionnaires regarding potential risk factors for skin and soft tissue infections. Those enrolled in the study were then observed over the course of the season for skin and soft tissue infections. Those infected had data about their infections collected. Results: One hundred ninety of 386 available student athletes enrolled in the study. Forty-four of the subjects had nasal colonization with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, and none were colonized with MRSA. There were 10 skin and soft tissue infections (8 bacterial and 2 fungal) documented over the course of the season. All were treated as outpatients with oral or topical antibiotics, and none were considered serious. Survey data from the preseason questionnaire showed 21% with skin infection, 11% with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, and none with MRSA infection during the past year. Three reported a remote history of MRSA infection. Conclusions: We documented an overall skin infection rate of 5.3% among high school football players over a single season. Our results suggest that skin and soft tissue infection may not be widespread among high school athletes in northeast Ohio. (J Am Board Fam Med 2011;24:429-435.)
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2011.04.100286" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.3122/jabfm.2011.04.100286</a>
Format
The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource
Journal Article or Conference Abstract Publication
2011
athlete
carriage
Community
Department of Family & Community Medicine
Department of Internal Medicine
Epidemiology
General & Internal Medicine
healthy-children
Journal Article or Conference Abstract Publication
Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Lear A
McCord G
MRSA
NEOMED College of Medicine
outbreak
Parikh A
Peiffer J
Population
Prevalence
risk-factors
Skin
Skin Infection
team
Warrington S
Watkins R R