Efficacy of intrathecal morphine administration in pediatric patients undergoing selective dorsal rhizotomy
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intrathecal morphine following selective dorsal rhizotomy in pediatric patients previously diagnosed with cerebral palsy.
Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort analysis over the course of four years. The analysis consisted of a treatment group which received intrathecal morphine (5 mcg/kg) injection and a control group that did not receive the injection prior to dural closure. All patients underwent multilevel laminectomies for selective dorsal rhizotomy at Akron Children's Hospital. The effectiveness of the treatment was measured by total dose of hydromorphone administered on patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), number of days on oral narcotics, and cumulative dose of oral narcotic.
Results: Of the analyzed 15 pediatric patients, seven patients received intrathecal morphine injection while the other eight did not receive the treatment prior to dural closure. There was a difference of 1135 mcg in total PCA dose between the study group (3243 mcg) and the control group (4378 mcg). The total PCA dose based on weight was lower in the study group (163 mcg/kg) than in the control group (171 mcg/kg).
Conclusion: Based on these findings, the administration of intrathecal morphine clinically reduces the opiate need in the first 96 hours post-operatively.
Jared Pennington
Shawnelle Contini
Miraides Brown
Nupur Goel
Tsulee Chen
J Pediatr Rehabil Med
. 2023 Feb 16. doi: 10.3233/PRM-220048. Online ahead of print.
2023
English
Postoperative Pain Protocol in Children after Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy.
Children; Epidural catheter; Multimodal approach; Postoperative pain; Selective dorsal rhizotomy
INTRODUCTION: Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) provides lasting relief of spasticity for children suffering from cerebral palsy, although controlling postoperative pain is challenging. Postoperatively, escalation of therapies to include a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump and intensive care unit (ICU) admission is common. OBJECTIVES: We developed a multimodal pain management protocol that included intraoperative placement of an epidural catheter with continuous opioid administration. We present the 3-year results of protocol implementation. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, all patients who were subjected to SDR at our institution were identified for review. Hourly pain scores were recorded. Adverse effects of medication, including desaturation, nausea/vomiting, and pruritus, were also noted. Comparisons were made between patients treated with PCA and those treated with multimodal pain control using t and χ2 tests as appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients undergoing the procedure with protocolized pain control (average age 6.8 years, 57% male) were compared to 7 PCA-treated controls (average age 6.6 years, 54% male). Pain control was satisfactory in both groups, with average pain scores of 1.5 in both groups on postoperative day 0, decreasing by postoperative day 3 to 1.1 in the PCA group and 0.5 in the protocol group. No patients under the protocol required ICU admission; all patients with PCA spent at least 1 day in the ICU. Desaturations were seen in 16 patients in the protocol group (41%), but none required ICU transfer. Treatment for pruritis was given to 57% of PCA patients and 15% of protocol patients. Treatment for nausea and vomiting was given to 100% of PCA patients and 51% of protocol patients. Medication requirements for the hospitalization were decreased from 1.1 to 0.28 doses per patient for pruritis, and from 3 to 1.1 doses per patient for nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal analgesia is an excellent alternative to PCA for postoperative pain after SDR. Actual analgesia is comparative to that of controls without the need for intensive care monitoring. Side effects of high-dose opiates were less frequent and required less medication. With the protocol, patients were safely treated outside the ICU.
Hatef J; Smith LGF; Veneziano GC; Martin DP; Bhalla T; Leonard JR
Pediatric Neurosurgery
2020
2020-09-07
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
journalArticle
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1159/000509333" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1159/000509333</a>