1
40
1
-
Text
A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.
URL Address
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/2381468318765172" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">http://doi.org/10.1177/2381468318765172</a>
Pages
2381468318765172–2381468318765172
Issue
1
Volume
3
Dublin Core
The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.
Title
A name given to the resource
Individualized Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Older Adults and Their Primary Care Providers: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Publisher
An entity responsible for making the resource available
MDM policy & practice
Date
A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource
2018
2018-06
Subject
The topic of the resource
colorectal cancer screening; individualized decision making; older adults; patient preference; screening discussions
Creator
An entity primarily responsible for making the resource
Kistler Christine E; Golin Carol; Sundaram Anupama; Morris Carolyn; Dalton Alexandra F; Ferrari Renee; Lewis Carmen L
Description
An account of the resource
Introduction. Discussions of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with older adults should be individualized to maximize appropriate screening. Our aim was to describe CRC screening discussions and explore their associations with patient characteristics and screening intentions. Methods. Cross-sectional survey of 422 primary care patients aged \textgreater/=70 years and eligible for CRC screening, including open-ended questions about CRC screening discussions. Primary outcomes were the frequency with which CRC screening discussions occurred, who had those discussions, and the domains that emerged from thematic analysis of participants' brief reports of their discussions. We also examined the associations between 1) patient characteristics and whether a screening discussion occurred and 2) the domains discussed and what screening decisions were made. Results. Of 422 participants, 209 reported having discussions and 201 responded to open-ended questions about CRC discussions. In a regression analysis, several factors were associated with increased odds of having a discussion: participants' preference to pursue screening (odds ratio [OR] 2.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3, 3.9), good health (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7, 4.8), and receipt of the decision aid (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4, 3.2). Our thematic analysis identified five domains related to discussion content and three related to discussion process. The CRC screening-related information domain was the most commonly discussed content domain, and the timing/frequency domain was associated with increased odds of intent to pursue screening. Decision-making role, the most commonly discussed process domain, was associated with increased odds of the intent to forgo CRC screening. Conclusions and Relevance. CRC screening discussions varied by type of participant and content. Future work is needed to determine if interventions focused on specific domains alters the appropriateness of participants' colorectal cancer screening intentions.
Identifier
An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context
<a href="http://doi.org/10.1177/2381468318765172" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">10.1177/2381468318765172</a>
Rights
Information about rights held in and over the resource
Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).
2018
colorectal cancer screening
Dalton Alexandra F
Ferrari Renee
Golin Carol
individualized decision making
Kistler Christine E
Lewis Carmen L
MDM policy & practice
Morris Carolyn
older adults
patient preference
screening discussions
Sundaram Anupama