Meta-analysis comparing outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with versus without percutaneous coronary intervention.
Title
Meta-analysis comparing outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with versus without percutaneous coronary intervention.
Creator
Lateef N; Khan MS; Deo VS; Yamani N; Riaz H; Virk HUH; Khan SU; Hedrick DP; Kanaan A; Reed GW; Krishnaswamy A; Puri R; Kapadia SR; Kalra A
Publisher
The American journal of cardiology
Date
2019
2019-12-01
Description
Patients having transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) routinely undergo coronary angiography before the procedure to define the coronary anatomy and to evaluate the extend of coronary artery disease (CAD). Whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior/concomitant with TAVI confers any additional clinical benefit in patients with CAD remains unclear. Literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus from inception of these databases till April 2019. Included outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), acute kidney injury, and 1-year mortality. The main summary estimate was random effects odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Eleven cohort studies enrolling 5,580 patients (mean age 82.4 years and 52.6% females) were included. Our study found no difference in effect estimates for 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 1.30 [0.85 to 1.98], p = 0.22, I(2) = 37.5%), stroke (OR 0.7 (0.36 to 1.45), p = 0.36, I(2) = 32.8%), MI (OR 2.71 [0.55 to 12.23], p = 0.22, I(2) = 41.3%), acute kidney injury (OR 0.7 [0.46 to 1.06], p = 0.08, I(2) = 14.4%) and 1-year all-cause mortality (OR 1.19 [0.92 to 1.52], p = 0.18, I(2) = 0.0%) in patients who underwent TAVI with and without PCI. In conclusion, our analysis indicates that PCI with TAVI in patients with severe aortic stenosis and concomitant CAD grants no additional clinical advantage in terms of patient important clinical outcomes. Further randomized studies are needed to better delineate the clinical practice for myocardial revascularization in patients receiving transcatheter therapy for aortic valve disease.
Subject
Humans; Treatment Outcome; Severity of Illness Index; Echocardiography; Coronary Angiography; Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications/diagnosis/surgery; Coronary Artery Disease/complications/diagnosis/surgery; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods
Rights
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Format
journalArticle
URL Address
Search for Full-text
Users with a NEOMED Library login can search for full-text journal articles at the following url: https://libraryguides.neomed.edu/home
Pages
1757-1764
Issue
11
Volume
124
ISSN
1879-1913 0002-9149
NEOMED College
NEOMED College of Medicine
NEOMED Department
Department of Internal Medicine
Update Year & Number
June2020SubmittedList
Affiliated Hospital
Cleveland Clinic Akron General Hospital
Citation
Lateef N; Khan MS; Deo VS; Yamani N; Riaz H; Virk HUH; Khan SU; Hedrick DP; Kanaan A; Reed GW; Krishnaswamy A; Puri R; Kapadia SR; Kalra A, “Meta-analysis comparing outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with versus without percutaneous coronary intervention.,” NEOMED Bibliography Database, accessed June 10, 2023, https://neomed.omeka.net/items/show/11173.