The practice of regional anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international survey of members of three regional anesthesia societies
Title
The practice of regional anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international survey of members of three regional anesthesia societies
Creator
Vishal Uppal
Harsha Shanthanna
Hari Kalagara
Rakesh V Sondekoppam
Sameh M Hakim
Meg A Rosenblatt
Amit Pawa
Alan J R Macfarlane
Eleni Moka
Samer Narouze
Date
2022
Description
Purpose: To determine the preferences and attitudes of members of regional anesthesia societies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We distributed an electronic survey to members of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Regional Anaesthesia-UK, and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia & Pain Therapy. A questionnaire consisting of 19 questions was developed by a panel of experienced regional anesthesiologists and distributed by email to the participants. The survey covered the following domains: participant information, practice settings, preference for the type of anesthetic technique, the use of personal protective equipment, and oxygen therapy.
Results: The survey was completed by 729 participants from 73 different countries, with a response rate of 20.1% (729/3,630) for the number of emails opened and 8.5% (729/8,572) for the number of emails sent. Most respondents (87.7%) identified as anesthesia staff (faculty or consultant) and practiced obstetric and non-obstetric anesthesia (55.3%). The practice of regional anesthesia either expanded or remained the same, with only 2% of respondents decreasing their use compared with the pre-pandemic period. The top reasons for an increase in the use of regional anesthesia was to reduce the need for an aerosol-generating medical procedure and to reduce the risk of possible complications to patients. The most common reason for decreased use of regional anesthesia was the risk of urgent conversion to general anesthesia. Approximately 70% of the responders used airborne precautions when providing care to a patient under regional anesthesia. The most common oxygen delivery method was nasal prongs (cannula) with a surgical mask layered over it (61%).
Conclusions: Given the perceived benefits of regional over general anesthesia, approximately half of the members of three regional anesthesia societies seem to have expanded their use of regional anesthesia techniques during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We distributed an electronic survey to members of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Regional Anaesthesia-UK, and the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia & Pain Therapy. A questionnaire consisting of 19 questions was developed by a panel of experienced regional anesthesiologists and distributed by email to the participants. The survey covered the following domains: participant information, practice settings, preference for the type of anesthetic technique, the use of personal protective equipment, and oxygen therapy.
Results: The survey was completed by 729 participants from 73 different countries, with a response rate of 20.1% (729/3,630) for the number of emails opened and 8.5% (729/8,572) for the number of emails sent. Most respondents (87.7%) identified as anesthesia staff (faculty or consultant) and practiced obstetric and non-obstetric anesthesia (55.3%). The practice of regional anesthesia either expanded or remained the same, with only 2% of respondents decreasing their use compared with the pre-pandemic period. The top reasons for an increase in the use of regional anesthesia was to reduce the need for an aerosol-generating medical procedure and to reduce the risk of possible complications to patients. The most common reason for decreased use of regional anesthesia was the risk of urgent conversion to general anesthesia. Approximately 70% of the responders used airborne precautions when providing care to a patient under regional anesthesia. The most common oxygen delivery method was nasal prongs (cannula) with a surgical mask layered over it (61%).
Conclusions: Given the perceived benefits of regional over general anesthesia, approximately half of the members of three regional anesthesia societies seem to have expanded their use of regional anesthesia techniques during the initial surge of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Source
Can J Anaesth
. 2022 Feb;69(2):243-255. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02150-8. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
. 2022 Feb;69(2):243-255. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02150-8. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
Language
English, French
URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02150-8
Citation
Vishal Uppal et al., “The practice of regional anesthesia during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international survey of members of three regional anesthesia societies,” NEOMED Bibliography Database, accessed April 26, 2024, https://neomed.omeka.net/items/show/12201.