Does the presence of ultrasound really affect computed tomographic scan use? A prospective randomized trial of ultrasound in trauma

Title

Does the presence of ultrasound really affect computed tomographic scan use? A prospective randomized trial of ultrasound in trauma

Creator

Rose J S; Levitt M A; Porter J; Hutson A; Greenholtz J; Nobay F; Hilty W

Publisher

Journal of Trauma-Injury Infection and Critical Care

Date

2001
2001-09

Description

Objective. There is a paucity of evidence demonstrating that emergency department (ED) ultrasound changes clinical practice in trauma patients. We hypothesized that the presence of ultrasound would affect clinical decision making as evidenced through abdominal computed tomographic WT) scan use in blunt multiple trauma patients. Methods. This study used a prospective randomized format in an urban county ED with Level II trauma center status (ED census, 72,000 patients per year). Participants were patients with multiple blunt injuries meeting trauma center triage criteria. Patients were randomized to receive either abdominal ultrasound or no ultrasound (control) during initial ED resuscitation. The primary outcome variable was use of abdominal CT scan in patients with and without ultrasound. Results. Two hundred eight patients were enrolled. The mean age was 40 +/- 18 years, and 62% were men. Mechanism of injury was motor vehicle crash, 56%; automobile versus pedestrian, 18%; motorcycle crash, 16%; falls, 10%; and other, 10%. One hundred four ultrasound and 104 control patients were analyzed. There were no apparent differences between ultrasound and control groups in demographics, injury type, or Injury Severity Score. Fifty-four of 104 (52%) of the control group received abdominal CT scans versus 37 of 104 (36%) abdominal CT scans for the ultrasound group; mean difference in proportions was 15.9 (p < 0.01; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-29.1). Conclusion. In this trial, the routine use of abdominal ultrasound in the evaluation of patients with multiple blunt injuries resulted in significantly fewer abdominal CT scans being obtained. A larger trial is needed to more clearly define the clinical and financial impact of ultrasound in the management of blunt abdominal trauma.

Subject

blunt abdominal-trauma; emergency; experience; fluid; General & Internal Medicine; hemoperitoneum; indicator; intraperitoneal; learning-curve; sonography; surgeon-performed ultrasound; Surgery; Ultrasonography

Format

Journal Article

Search for Full-text

Users with a NEOMED Library login can search for full-text journal articles at the following url: https://libraryguides.neomed.edu/home

Rights

Article information provided for research and reference use only. All rights are retained by the journal listed under publisher and/or the creator(s).

Pages

545-549

Issue

3

Volume

51

Citation

Rose J S; Levitt M A; Porter J; Hutson A; Greenholtz J; Nobay F; Hilty W, “Does the presence of ultrasound really affect computed tomographic scan use? A prospective randomized trial of ultrasound in trauma,” NEOMED Bibliography Database, accessed March 19, 2024, https://neomed.omeka.net/items/show/6892.